ATCO Identification
Can anyone please help identify my ATCO; model no, size and year of manufacture. All I can see is UD14 on the nameplate but an online search shows up nothing under that number except tractors!
Thanks
Best regards,
Anthony
Forums
I’d go with the De Luxe which
I’d go with the De Luxe which came in 14, 17 and 20” sizes. 14” was good, 17 ok but 20” was stretching things a bit. I’d say they ran from 1970 until they were strengthened and appeared as the Commodore range in the late 80s
Thanks guys. I'll post again
Thanks guys. I'll post again when I've put it back together.
Anthony
I'm assuming the other end of
I'm assuming the other end of tape measure is on end of cylinder? or outside of machine? so 14 or 17?
Unable to see rear roller clearly? single on 14, double on 17?
Brochure entry from 1976 below showing 14 but assuming yours is 17.
Not seeing the other end of
Not seeing the other end of that measure is a bit of a tease, but would also guess from the blower & engine spacing on the deck its a 17" ?
Love those brochures, I think my uncle had a haircut like that, my dad had this shirt :-)
Clothing aside, I’d say that
Clothing aside, I’d say that the image showing the machine’s high cut capabilities is decidedly optimistic !
Thanks everyone.
Thanks everyone.
I've replaced the cylinder bearings which were seized solid with spares from http://www.themowercentrehailsham.com courtesy of Mr Jon Cruse - thank you Jon - but on blade adjustment the springs have fully compressed before the cylinder engages with the bottom blade so I need a new cylinder.
Can anyone please advise if this is a suitable one?
'again.
Best regards,
Anthony
Looks ok just so long as it’s
Looks ok just so long as it’s not worn down as much as yours.
A new bottom blade on your sole plate may resolve your problem for a while , at least. A close up image of the blades on your cylinder, side and end on may give a better ideal of amount of wear.
Thanks wristpin.
Thanks wristpin.
Diameter is about 5" in olde money. Any idea what it should be?
See photos:
Best,
Anthony
From what I can see the
From what I can see the blades on that cylinder are not protruding very much over the supporting “webs”, indicating that it’s not in the flush of youth! . I don’t think that there was any published information on the new cylinder diameter and I haven’t got a cylinder to compare it with - sorry, not much help really .
Anyone know what the bolt
Anyone know what the bolt threads that hold the side plates on would be. Cannot be metric?? BSF? BSW?...???
Early ones BSF, later ones
Early ones BSF, later ones UNF.
Why do you want to remove the side plates ? If it is to remove the cutting unit, then you do not need to, just remove the cylinder sprocket and front roller assembly, then, at each end of the unit, remove the bolts that secure it. The cutter unit should now drop out.
Definitely a DeLuxe B17,
Definitely a DeLuxe B17, probably a mid 70's model with what looks like the larger 98cc cast iron Suffolk unit instead of the more common 75cc.
Agreed - 17 in model should
Agreed - 17 in model should have 98 cc . Can easily be identified looking at the cowling retained headbolts . If there is a bolt head showing under the cowling between the two that retain the cowl is 98cc, if not 75cc.
If the cylinder is good condition though worn, you can get a last go by grinding the ends of the springs by a mm or two but as stated a new bottom blade often solves the problem .Have to say this is a bodge and not good practise. These cylinders had quite soft steel blades which probably speeded up the wear
Hi Anthony,
Hi Anthony,
I think that must be a Atco DeLuxe B17. Build would be begin 80's, maybe that someone else can determine an exact date from the serial.